Contact Nick Naumof

I help companies design services and experiences that work with human nature, not against it.

A large multi-story building under construction at dusk or night, with several tall cranes, scaffolding, and concrete pillars silhouetted against a deep blue twilight sky, conveying steady progress and thoughtful structure.
About Nick Naumof

Nick Naumof is an applied behavioral science thought leader and researcher. He studied people from different scientific perspectives — economics, consumer behavior, behavioral economics, and evolutionary psychology — and helps companies bridge design and psychology to create better experiences for customers and employees.

Originally from Romania, Nick lived in The Netherlands for five years and has been based in the Washington D.C. Metro area since 2015. He has been married to Cornelia since 2011.

Speaking and Training

With over ten years of experience designing and delivering public presentations and training programs, Nick has led workshops, masterclasses, and conference talks on four continents. His project experience spans financial product design, fast-moving consumer goods, health and wellness, and human resources.

Masterclasses include Designing Decisions (choice architecture), Thinking Money (financial services), Nudge Design, and Behavioral Design for Incentives and Rewards. In February 2017, he delivered a talk on behavioral design for incentives and rewards at Action Design Washington DC.

Book: It Makes (No) Sense

Nick is the author of It Makes (No) Sense, a book that explores how behavioral science applies to real-world scenarios. The book is part of a broader resource library available on the site, complementing the blog and learning programs.

Learn more about the book →

Behavioral Service Design

Nick's approach integrates behavioral science into service design, creating experiences that align with how people actually think and decide. This work applies across industries — from finance and retail to health and employee engagement — always with the goal of designing services that respect human nature.

Explore behavioral service design →

Emotions at Work

Understanding emotional drivers in professional settings is central to improving employee satisfaction and engagement. Nick's work on emotions at work connects emotional design principles with measurable service outcomes, offering strategies for leveraging emotions constructively in the workplace.

Read about emotions at work →

Designing better waiting experiences with behavioural science

Waiting is a service experience, not an empty gap between useful moments. A customer in a queue is forming judgements about fairness, competence and respect, even when the underlying delay is unavoidable. The same ten minutes can feel tolerable in one setting and infuriating in another.

The behavioural science of waiting helps organisations separate actual duration from perceived duration. By reducing uncertainty, creating visible progress and giving people meaningful choices, service designers can make queues feel shorter while improving trust and satisfaction.

Why waiting feels longer than it is

People rarely experience time as a neutral measurement. An unoccupied minute invites attention to the delay, while a minute filled with information, conversation or a simple task passes more quickly. This is why a slow-moving queue can feel unbearable even when the clock shows a modest wait.

Uncertainty adds a second burden. Customers cope better with a known fifteen-minute wait than an unexplained five-minute delay. In Sydney, a passenger waiting for a delayed train can become more frustrated when the platform display repeatedly says “due” than when it gives a clear revised arrival time.

Queue design should therefore address two forms of time: actual waiting time and perceived waiting time. Operations teams can shorten the first through staffing and process changes, while behavioural design makes the second easier to tolerate.

Make progress and uncertainty visible

People want evidence that the system is moving. Numbered tickets, queue position updates, estimated service times and visible preparation stages all turn an abstract delay into a sequence with a destination. Progress indicators work because they give customers a sense of momentum.

Accuracy matters more than false optimism. If an online booking says “your appointment will start at 10:00” but the service regularly begins at 10:20, the promise damages credibility. A realistic range, such as “15–25 minutes,” can feel more trustworthy than a precise but unreliable estimate.

Information should also explain causes where appropriate. A sign stating that extra identity checks are required for a particular service can reduce suspicion, provided the wording is clear and respectful. Under the Australian Consumer Law, businesses should avoid representations about service timing that are misleading or cannot reasonably be delivered.

Give customers meaningful control

Agency changes the emotional meaning of a queue. People are more patient when they can choose between waiting in place, receiving a text message, joining a virtual queue or returning at a later time. These options reduce the feeling of being trapped.

Choice must be designed carefully. Too many alternatives create decision fatigue, especially in hospitals, government services or busy transport hubs. A small set of useful options is usually enough: wait here, receive an alert, or select another available time.

For organisations developing a new service, discuss your service can be a practical way to connect customer research with behavioural principles. Interviews and observation often reveal that the biggest pain point is not duration itself, but the lack of control surrounding it.

Occupy attention without creating friction

Occupied time feels shorter than unoccupied time, but entertainment is not always the answer. The right intervention depends on the context. A café might display the preparation stages for an order, while a government office could provide a checklist that helps visitors prepare for the next step.

Small acts of progress can also create value during a delay. A hospital patient completing forms, a bank customer reviewing account options or a traveller checking platform information is doing something relevant rather than simply consuming distraction.

In Melbourne, commuters familiar with myki readers and platform displays already understand how information can structure a journey. Similar cues can improve waiting in retail and service environments: show what is happening, what will happen next and what the customer can do now.

Make the queue feel fair

Fairness is often judged through comparison. A customer may accept a long wait if everyone appears to be served in order, yet become angry when another person is seen to jump ahead without explanation. Perceived injustice can outweigh the length of the delay.

Different queue models suit different services. First-in, first-served works well when requests are similar. Appointment slots reduce uncertainty for complex services. Triage is appropriate when urgency differs, but its criteria should be explained so that priority does not look arbitrary.

Physical conditions matter too. In Australia’s hot summers, a long outdoor queue at a government office, event venue or clinic can become a health and accessibility issue rather than a minor inconvenience. Shade, seating, water, clear signage and accessible paths communicate that the organisation recognises the real cost of waiting.

Training staff is part of the design. Frontline workers need language for explaining delays, acknowledging frustration and applying priority rules consistently. Organisations can build these capabilities through leadership training that links employee behaviour with the customer experience.

Measure the emotional journey

Queue performance should include more than average wait time. Useful measures include the percentage of customers who abandon the queue, how often estimates are missed, complaints about fairness, perceived waiting duration and satisfaction immediately after service.

A simple research exercise can compare two versions of the same queue: one with no information and one with progress updates and choices. Ask customers to estimate their wait, record actual duration and observe abandonment. This reveals whether a change improves perception, operations or both.

Design approach Behavioural effect Suitable Australian example Main risk
Estimated wait range Reduces uncertainty Clinic or call centre Damages trust if routinely inaccurate
Virtual queue Creates agency and mobility Retail service desk or council office Customers may miss alerts
Visible progress stages Makes movement tangible Café order or permit application Feels performative if progress stalls
Clear priority rules Protects perceived fairness Hospital triage or accessible service Confusion if criteria are hidden
Seating, shade and water Reduces physical discomfort Outdoor event or summer queue Requires space and maintenance

A better waiting experience begins with research into what customers notice, fear and value during the delay. Nick Naumof helps organisations apply behavioural science to service design, customer journeys and employee experiences. Explore the relevant consulting support through the contact page and turn unavoidable waits into clearer, fairer and more human moments.

Nick's blog covers topics including pricing strategies, loss aversion, the peak-end rule, and customer experience design. Notable posts include How to sell a 5¢ product for 1$ (December 2015), How to Reduce the Pain of Payment for Customers (July 2016), The Future of Applied Behavioral Science Will NOT Be About Behavioral Science (July 2014), When Designing Experiences, Think About What Happens After the Interaction Ends (March 2018), and The Email that Plays an Important Role in Customer Experience Without It Being Opened (March 2018).

Visit the blog →

Media and Thought Leadership

Nick's work has been featured on platforms including mycustomer.com and behavioraleconomics.com. His media appearances and conference talks showcase applied behavioral science in action, reinforcing his role as a trusted voice in the field.

Browse media appearances →

Get in Touch

For inquiries about training programs, workshops, or speaking engagements, use the contact form to ensure your message reaches Nick's inbox. When not traveling, he typically responds within one working day. You can also follow Nick on Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook.

Contact Nick →